Google
online homeschool

[Home]
[Pacific Justice Institute]

che
nheri
hs central
hsmom
about hs
hs logo
cde
accreditation
BuiltWithNOF
CA Court of Appeal - Ruling

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL HOMESCHOOL RULING

Pacific Justice Institute (Sunland Christian's legal team) and
United State Justice Foundation (the family's legal team) IMG_2664
are the legal organizations directly involved in the defense for homeschooling in California!

To receive EMAIL UPDATES, join the list!

To DONATE to the cause!

UPDATE May 6, 2008

In the midst of wild speculations, spins on who’s doing what, declarations of involvement, statements of actions being taken, it is important to keep the homeschool community informed about what is happening on the legal side of this case.

While the initial ruling has been vacated, the process is in motion for the court of Appeals to rehear the case and hand down a new decision. This process happens somewhat quietly behind the scenes without much public drama, making it unknown to the homeschool community about the process. Following is a skeleton schedule of the process to help the public understand what has and will be happening and the time frames involved.

Feb 28 – In Re Rachel L ruling handed down.
March 14 – Long family and Sunland Christian School petition for rehearing
March 25 – The Court of Appeals vacated their ruling and grants a rehearing
April 28 – The Longs and Sunland Christian School file first briefs for the rehearing (1 of 3 briefs to be filed by these parties). These are the only ones allowed at this time.

UPCOMING: (some dates are approximate)

May 14 – Long children’s court appoint attorneys file their first brief
May 19 – The Long family and Sunland Christian School will file their second brief ( a first response to the children’s attorneys brief) Other invited or approved organizations must file their Amicus Briefs by this date. (So far the list consists of California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, California Department of Education-Legal, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles County Board of Education, California Federation of Teachers, CTA State Headquarters, and United Teachers of Los Angeles) “This court will also consider timely applications to file amicus curiae briefs from any other party or entity if the application for such participation demonstrates that the additional brief(s) might assist the court in deciding the matter.”

June 2 – The Long family, Sunland Christian School and the children’s court appointed attorneys may file a final response brief to any amicus briefs (final filing ).

June – (date to be set by court) - Oral Arguments (limited to the parties in this case). These arguments are not for providing witnesses or additional evidence, but for the attorneys to give their final presentations.

October 1 - A new ruling will be decided by the Court of Appeals and could be handed down by or before October 1, 2008. The action to follow will depend on the ruling. As pure speculation, a favorable ruling could confirm homeschooling as a legal option for education without new legislation. An unfavorable one will be appealed to the California State Supreme Court, placing on hold any ruling until the court turns down an appeal or rules on the case after a hearing.

Sunland Christian School appreciates all the support, prayers and donations given by thousands of homeschoolers throughout California and the nation (donations are needed to help cover costs related to this defense: phone, mailing, transportation, etc).

We ask that you consider giving a donation to Sunland Christian School and/or Pacific Justice Institute, our legal team, for all the hard work they are donating to this cause for all homeschoolers.

Please forward this page to your support group, ISP, friends, church, media, etc., to help provide an accurate understanding of the process ahead and to invite prayer for the outcome of this case.

UPDATE - 4/28/08

   Pacific Justice Institute and Sunland Christian School will file in the Court of Appeal for the granted rehearing of the case.

UPDATE / 4-2-08

     The Court of Appeal of the State of California has vacated its ruling and has granted a rehearing of In re Rachel L. Oral arguments may be heard as early as June. The Court of Appeal will hand down a new ruling at the end of this process (approximately 3-4 months after the rehearing). It will be determined at that time what the necessary steps will be as a result of the new ruling. The court has invited Amicus Curiae briefs of the following organizations: California State Superintendent of Public Instruction, California Department of Education, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles County Board of Education, California Federation of Teachers, CTA State Headquarters, United Teachers of Los Angeles and Sunland Christian School. Others (HSLDA, etc) may petition the court to file a brief. The court will determine if they will allow them to file.

     Sunland Christian School and Pacific Justice Institute will pursue an appeal at the California Supreme Court on the motion to intervene.

Click on the following links for more information:

Background History
Are You Confused?
What Should Homeschoolers and Administrators Do Now?
Be a Part of the Solution, not the ProblemIMG_2676
Words of Encouragement to Homeschoolers
Governor Schwarznegger's Statement
Watch Fox News Clip on This Ruling
Watch CNN's Headline News Clip on This Ruling.
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Joel Anderson's California Resolution
Press Conference at the State Capitol
WHAT'S NEXT?

HOW CAN I HELP?

DONATE NOW!
Help raise funds to defend homeschooling in California!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background History

     A family in Sunland Christian School (SCS) dealt with allegations from the Department of Children Services (DCS) through the Juvenile Court. The  judged closed the case, handing down a favorable decision for the family allowing them to continue homeschooling. The DCS worker closed their case.

     However, the court appointed lawyers for the children didn't like the ruling and appealed to the California Court of Appeals. During this process, no new evidence or testimony could be heard and the court made a decision based on the information, evidence and process of the lower court. Their decision indicated parents do not have a constitutional right in the State of California to determine their children's education and deemed that no form of homeschooling is legal in the state. We believe this decision is misinformed and needs to be overturned.

     This ruling affects all homeschoolers and homeschool programs, both public and private, in the State of California. Sunland Christian School has become the representative group for homeschoolers in this ruling, and has a  moral and legal obligation to pursue all possible due process in having this ruling overturned. SCS' board, after interviewing various legal defense funds, determined that Pacific Justice Institutewas the best fit for representing SCS and homeschoolers in California.
 

ARE YOU CONFUSED?

     With the Court of Appeals ruling In re Rachel L., there were many different opinions and statements being promoted on the original ruling.

LET'S LOOK AT SOME OF THE FACTS:
1. The original ruling had set a precedent and interpreted the law in California. It was not a ruling just for the family involved.
2. At this moment, there is no provision in the California Constitution defining parent’s right to direct their children's education. (We believe all homeschool families have a constitutional right).
3. California Educational statutes do not currently define homeschooling.
4. California homeschoolers have been educating their children under the current laws for the past 27+ years without any major conflict.
5. The ruling would have effected both private home homeschoolers and public charter home school programs, distant learning and independent study programs.
6. While legal appeals and processes are still being pursued (which SCS's legal team, Pacific Justice, has done) the ruling has been vacated until a new ruling is handed down. Additional appeals can occur after a new ruling (possible 4 months to 5 years). During this time no homeschool family will be challenged in a court of law with this ruling.

WHAT WERE SOME OF THE PROBLEMS of the origial ruling:
1. This ruling originally created panic among homeschoolers. We encourage homeschool groups to continue all homeschool support! Please do not to feed the panic, confusion, or use it for personal gain.
2. If this ruling was left alone (because of fear that the California Supreme Court might uphold the ruling), then the ruling would continue to stand as law, unless new legislation is submitted and passed. New legislation will not be introducted until this legal process is complete. So appealing to the California Supreme Court is a necessary step.
3. If the ruling was de-published, it would then only apply to the family involved in the case (This also requires a  California Supreme Court decision.) However, in that condition, anyone could still use the case to take any homeschool family to court on the same grounds. De-publishing the case only temporarily  helps everyone else, but the family involved, and continues to leave everyone at risk. De-publishing would create an ongoing state of panic, increased court cases against homeschoolers and offers no  guarantee of our constitutional rights being protected. It would throw the Long family under the bus, to generate a guaranteed widespread need for increased homeschool legal defense. The resolution for this is an appeal to the California Supreme Court or new legislation in the event the ruling is not overturned. Homeschoolers do not want new legislation.
4. The Court of Appeal will now rehear the case. This opportunity, which has been granted, will allow the court to revisit this case with new briefs. The new ruling can completely change the direction things were going. It could possibly provide homeschooling with a more secure future than we have had to date.
 

WHAT SHOULD HOMESCHOOLERS AND ADMINISTRATORS DO NOW!

     First of all don't panic. Help those who feel distraught and afraid, to be at peace and have faith for a favorable outcome. While we having this ruling reheard, it won't be used in court against homeschoolers. Continue to homeschool effectively, caring about your family, children, their growth and development and their academic instruction.

     Administrators of ISPs need to comfort their families, assuring them there is no need to panic, and continue to serve your families well. Many ISPs  are continuing to enroll new families and are experiencing an increase in inquiries about their programs. This is a pivotal time to continue in prayer and good works, and be strong and of a good  courage! Don't pull back and alter what you are doing, except in areas where improvement is needed. Don't model behavior which fosters confusion and panic in your children. They need you to lead and  love them with confidence! Encourage each other with these words.
 

BE A PART OF THE SOLUTION, NOT THE PROBLEM!
 Terry Neven

     While it is normal for anyone to feel panic, insecurity, uncertainty, anger and a wide range of various emotions, as a result of the Court of Appeals  ruling, do not let your feelings control your words or actions. When we do, it usually is destructive rather than constructive and it effects us individually as well. Don't be a contributor to spreading unfounded statements or gossip. In situations of this type, people try to find someone to blame when situations out of their control effect them. "If only the school had..." "Something must be wrong with the family..." Why aren't certain homeschool leaders more directly involved?"

     Spreading negative and unsubstantiated facts is gossip, and while it can be a stimulating past time, it doesn't help in the overall picture. Don't jump to conclusions based on limited information. We have all seen the results of angry, emotionally charged persons, reacting to their limited information, giving their opinion in a negative way. Churches, families and communities split over this type of behavior.

     As the homeschool community, we need to pull together and help one another, regardless of style, philosophy, political preferences, religious  beliefs, organization affiliation, etc. Don't talk negatively about other homeschool leaders or groups you don't know or agree with. Pray for them. Uphold them. Speak well of them and do good to them. If we don't have something supportive to say, don't say anything at all. Don't be the creator or spreader of gossip. Cases can be lost by unnecessary infighting within any movement or organization. Be a strong link in the chain, as we all pull together for positive change in California!
 

WORDS OF ENCOURAGEMENT TO HOMESCHOOLERS
Laura Neven

     At a time when the validity of homeschooling is being questioned and our right to choose to homeschool is being challenged, we need to be reassured  of the reasons for our choice to homeschool. Without question we all know the significance of our children getting a solid academic based education. With concerns about the environment and content of education available to our children through our public school system, we as parents find many reasons to be concerned about how that system is serving our children. We were given the awesome gift and  responsibility of raising children, and this creates a desire and need to make choices that are the best for them.

     We recognize that we can not shelter our children from elements of concern that they are exposed to everyday, whether in a social or public setting,  not to mention television and other media publications. We can guide, guard and limit that exposure and provide supportive tools to assist them in interacting with others and discerning how to deal  with situations they will face. Our children are the young men and women of the future. How we, with God's guidance, participate in the influencing, shaping and molding of their lives is crucial. God's call for us to homeschool, as a means of guiding, nurturing and loving our children through these early years of their lives, is a call we have answered!

     The concerns that lead us to the choice to homeschool are also the foundation from which we must stand together in support of our choice. Life is never free of challenges that cause us to examine our values, morals and priorities we have set. We need to stand in unity for our children, our family and God's Family by seeking to uphold the values of family. Be assured of Sunland's continued support of your family, no matter where you homeschool, as we stand with you in the raising of your precious children.
 

GOVERNOR SCHWARZNEGGER'S STATEMENT

     "Every California child deserves a quality education and parents should have the right to decide what's best for their children. Parents should  not be penalized for acting in the best interests of their children's education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned by the courts and if the courts don't protect parents' rights then, as elected officials, we will."
 

CALIFORNIA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

     Jack O'Connell, Superintendent of Public Instruction states, "The California Department of Education policy will not change in any way as a result of this ruling. Parents still have the right to homeschool in this state."
 

JOEL ANDERSON'S CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION

     California Assemblyman Joel Anderson (R-El Cajon) has introduced a resolution supporting homeschooling and calling on the Supreme Court to reverse  the Second Appellate Court ruling In re Rachel L. SCS is requesting that California residents support homeschooling by contact their legislators & ask them to vote for this resolution.
 

PRESS CONFERENCE AT THE STATE CAPITOL

    Assemblyman Ted Gaines, Pacific Justice Institute's Chief Counsel, Kevin Snider, and Sunland Christian School's principal, Terry Neven, held a press conference on Thursday, March 13, 2008, to discuss its legal response to the In re Rachel L. anti-homeschooling court ruling which has sparked nationwide shock and outrage. The press conference took place on the west steps of the State Capitol in Sacramento.
 

HOW CAN I HELP?

1. Pray!!!! Any specific help needed will be requested!!
2. Give your support in words and financially. While Pacific Justice Institute is taking this case pro bono,  expenses in handling a case like this could cost $250,000.00 or more.

     Thank you for your contributions to Pacific Justice Institute and Sunland Christian School! Your contribution will only be used for this defense. DONATE NOW!

WHAT'S NEXT?

     Following are the steps and possible directions the defense by Pacific Justice Institute for SCS and the homeschool can take:
1. The Court of Appeals will rehear the case (oral arguments in June).
2. We will continue to file a petition for appeal to the California Supreme Court. If they grant us an appeal, we will continue to preparing for a hearing.
4. When the Court of Appeal hands down a new ruling, it will be determined at that time what are the proper steps to follow. If unfavorable, we will file for an apeal to the California Supreme Court.
5. If all these steps do not return a favorable ruling for homeschooling, the Governor and
legislators will most likely steps through legislation. No homeschool group desires legislation. However, if things come to this, we will need to make sure restrictive legislation is not passed.

[Home] [Pacific Justice Institute]